4 Unconventional Tips for a Successful Home Hospice Program

4 Unconventional Tips for a Successful Home Hospice Program

4 Unconventional Tips for a Successful Home Hospice Program

The American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Drugs (AAHPM) Annual Assembly is the premier instructional occasion for hospice and palliative drugs professionals. The assembly presents a variety of instructional classes, networking alternatives, and displays from main hospice and palliative care organizations. The 2025 Annual Assembly can be held in San Diego, California, from March 28-31. The AAHPM Summary Submission website is now open for submissions. The deadline for summary submissions is October 15, 2024. Summary submissions are peer-reviewed and chosen for presentation based mostly on their scientific advantage and relevance to the sphere of hospice and palliative drugs.

The AAHPM Annual Assembly is a superb alternative to share your analysis and study from different hospice and palliative care professionals. The assembly presents a wide range of instructional classes on matters corresponding to ache administration, symptom administration, bereavement care, and moral points in hospice and palliative care. The assembly additionally presents alternatives to community with different hospice and palliative care professionals and study concerning the newest services and products from main hospice and palliative care organizations.

If you’re concerned in hospice or palliative care analysis, we encourage you to submit an summary for the 2025 AAHPM Annual Assembly. The deadline for summary submissions is October 15, 2024. For extra details about the summary submission course of, please go to the AAHPM web site.

AAHPM Summary Submission 2025: Name for Proposals

Summary Submission Timeline

The AAHPM Summary Submission 2025 timeline is as follows:

  • Summary submission opens: [date]
  • Summary submission deadline: [date]
  • Notification of summary acceptance: [date]
  • Early registration deadline: [date]
  • Convention dates: [date] – [date]

Summary Submission Pointers

Authors are invited to submit abstracts for oral or poster displays on a variety of matters associated to hospice and palliative drugs. Abstracts needs to be not more than 300 phrases in size and will embrace the next data:

  • Title of the summary
  • Authors’ names and affiliations
  • Summary physique
  • Key phrases

Abstracts can be peer-reviewed by a panel of specialists in hospice and palliative drugs. The assessment course of can be based mostly on the next standards:

  • Originality and significance of the analysis
  • High quality of the analysis design and strategies
  • Readability and conciseness of the summary

Summary Submission Classes

Abstracts may be submitted within the following classes:

  • Analysis
  • Schooling
  • Medical Follow
  • Coverage and Advocacy

Authors are inspired to submit abstracts that handle the next precedence areas:

Precedence Areas for Analysis

– Symptom administration on the finish of life
– Take care of susceptible populations
– Advance care planning
– Palliative care integration
– Interdisciplinary collaboration

Precedence Areas for Schooling

– Hospice and palliative care schooling for healthcare professionals
– Public schooling about hospice and palliative care
– Interdisciplinary schooling
– Cultural competence
– Moral decision-making

Precedence Areas for Medical Follow

– Interdisciplinary crew care
– Symptom administration
– Advance care planning
– Care transitions
– Communication

Precedence Areas for Coverage and Advocacy

– Entry to hospice and palliative care
– Reimbursement for hospice and palliative care providers
– Public coverage on end-of-life care
– Advocacy for susceptible populations
– High quality of care

The Artwork of a Compelling Summary: Submission Pointers and Greatest Practices

Submission Pointers

To make sure the best high quality of abstracts for assessment, AAHPM adheres to a complete set of submission tips. These tips are designed to supply a transparent and concise framework for researchers to current their work and promote a constant assessment course of. Adhering to those tips is important for profitable summary submission and presentation.

Greatest Practices

Writing a Compelling Summary

The summary is the center of your submission, and its impression could make or break your probabilities of choice for presentation. Listed below are some key greatest practices to make sure a compelling and impactful summary:

  • Clearly State Your Speculation or Goal: Start your summary with a concise and particular assertion of your analysis query or speculation.
  • Describe Your Strategies and Outcomes Objectively: Present a quick overview of your methodology and spotlight a very powerful outcomes with out overgeneralizing or drawing untimely conclusions.
  • Quantify Your Findings: At any time when attainable, use numerical information to help your claims and exhibit the importance of your findings.
  • Spotlight the Significance of Your Work: Clarify how your analysis contributes to the sphere and why it’s related to AAHPM’s mission.
  • Proofread Fastidiously: Be certain that your summary is freed from grammatical errors, typos, and inconsistencies. First impressions matter, and a well-written summary displays positively in your work.
Summary Part Phrase Restrict
Title 25 phrases
Background and Goals 150 phrases
Strategies 150 phrases
Outcomes 150 phrases
Conclusions 50 phrases

Enhancing the Influence of Your Summary: Dissemination Methods

Maximizing Attain and Influence

To maximise the attain and impression of your summary, think about the next methods:

  1. Current on the AAHPM Convention: This offers a direct platform to share your analysis with attendees, community with specialists, and generate curiosity in your work.
  2. Publish within the AAHPM Journal: Submit your summary for consideration within the AAHPM Journal, which publishes cutting-edge analysis and views in hospice and palliative drugs.
  3. Make the most of Social Media: Share your summary and convention attendance on social media platforms like Twitter and LinkedIn, utilizing related hashtags to attach with researchers, clinicians, and most people excited about hospice and palliative care.

Leveraging Partnerships

Collaborate with organizations and people to broaden the dissemination of your summary and have interaction a wider viewers.

  1. Skilled Associations: Attain out to skilled associations just like the Nationwide Hospice and Palliative Care Group (NHPCO) or the American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Drugs (AAHPM) to discover alternatives for presenting or publishing your work.
  2. Media Shops: Contact healthcare-focused media retailers to pitch your summary for inclusion in articles or press releases.
  3. Affected person Advocacy Teams: Associate with affected person advocacy teams to share your findings with these affected by hospice and palliative care, elevating consciousness and selling understanding.

Creating Extra Supplies

Develop supplementary supplies to boost the impression of your summary and make your analysis extra accessible.

Materials Advantages
Slideshow Presentation: Create a visually participating slideshow presentation to accompany your summary at conferences or for on-line dissemination. Visually illustrate your findings and make them extra digestible for a broader viewers.
Analysis Temporary: Develop a one-page analysis transient summarizing your summary’s key findings and implications. Present a concise and accessible overview of your analysis for fast reference and sharing.
Infographic: Create an infographic that visually represents your information and highlights your analysis’s impression. Interact audiences with visually interesting and simply comprehensible data.

A Deep Dive into the Evaluate Course of: Standards and Expectations

Evaluate Standards

Abstracts are evaluated based mostly on the next standards:

  • Significance: The summary ought to handle an vital challenge or query in palliative drugs.
  • Innovation: The summary ought to current new or progressive approaches to palliative care.
  • Rigor: The summary needs to be based mostly on sound analysis strategies and proof.
  • Readability: The summary needs to be written clearly and concisely, utilizing exact language and applicable terminology.

Evaluate Course of

Abstracts are reviewed by a panel of specialists in palliative drugs. The assessment course of is double-blind, which means that reviewers have no idea the identification of the authors.

Every summary is scored on the 4 standards listed above. The scores are then averaged to find out the general rating for the summary. The very best-scoring abstracts are chosen for presentation on the AAHPM convention.

Detailed Expectations for Innovation and Rigor

  • Innovation:** Abstracts ought to exhibit a transparent understanding of the present state of palliative drugs and establish areas the place new or improved approaches are wanted. Proposals needs to be possible, with a transparent plan for implementation and analysis.
  • Rigor:** Abstracts needs to be based mostly on sound analysis strategies and proof. Research needs to be designed to reply a particular query or speculation, and the outcomes needs to be reported precisely and objectively.
    Facet of Rigor Expectations
    Analysis Design Examine design needs to be applicable for the analysis query and use applicable strategies to gather and analyze information.
    Knowledge Assortment Knowledge needs to be collected utilizing legitimate and dependable strategies, with applicable pattern dimension and sampling strategies.
    Knowledge Evaluation Statistical analyses needs to be performed appropriately and outcomes interpreted accurately.
    Reporting Outcomes needs to be offered clearly and concisely, with applicable use of tables and figures.

    The Significance of Early Submission and Planning

    Submitting your summary early for the AAHPM convention in 2025 presents quite a few benefits. This is why you must prioritize early motion:

    Elevated Possibilities of Acceptance

    Submitting your summary early offers the assessment committee ample time to completely consider your work and supply constructive suggestions. Early submission permits for potential revisions and enhancements earlier than the ultimate deadline.

    Most well-liked Presentation Time Slots

    Early summary submissions offer you a greater probability of securing most well-liked presentation time slots. The convention organizers usually accommodate presenters who submit their abstracts early.

    Networking Alternatives

    Attending the convention early means that you can join with fellow researchers, professionals, and potential collaborators from the sphere of hospice and palliative drugs.

    Skilled Recognition

    Presenting your analysis at a nationally acknowledged convention like AAHPM enhances your skilled profile and showcases your experience in hospice and palliative drugs.

    Enhanced Analysis Visibility

    Your summary can be included within the convention proceedings and revealed in a peer-reviewed journal, offering wider visibility on your analysis and its potential impression on the sphere.

    Part Timeline
    Summary Submission Deadline March 15, 2025
    Early Submission Incentive Deadline November 1, 2024

    To make sure a profitable summary submission, think about the next timeline and incentives:

    Collaborating on Multi-Creator Abstracts: Suggestions for Success

    1. Set up Clear Roles and Duties

    Outline every writer’s contributions, together with information assortment, writing particular sections, and enhancing. Assign timelines and guarantee all members are conscious of their duties.

    2. Talk Successfully

    Use common communication channels corresponding to e mail, cellphone, or video conferencing. Focus on concepts, present suggestions, and handle any issues or questions promptly.

    3. Use Collaborative Writing Instruments

    Think about using instruments corresponding to Google Docs or Dropbox to facilitate real-time collaboration and monitoring adjustments. This permits a number of authors to work on the summary concurrently.

    4. Respect Views and Opinions

    Acknowledge that every writer’s perspective and experience could differ. Worth their enter and work collectively to seek out frequent floor whereas sustaining a respectful {and professional} setting.

    5. Search Suggestions Early and Usually

    Share drafts with colleagues, mentors, or different summary reviewers to acquire precious suggestions. This helps establish areas for enchancment and ensures the summary is well-written and compelling.

    6. Proofread Fastidiously Earlier than Submission

    Proofread the ultimate summary meticulously for any errors in grammar, spelling, and formatting. Take note of consistency in model, citations, and references. Think about asking a trusted colleague to assessment the summary for a further perspective.

    Selling Range and Inclusion in Summary Submissions

    Illustration of Underrepresented Teams

    Encourage submissions from authors from various backgrounds, together with racial and ethnic minorities, ladies, LGBTQ+ people, and people with disabilities.

    Inclusive Language and Terminology

    Present clear tips for authors to make use of inclusive language and terminology that respects all identities and experiences.

    Accessibility

    Be certain that the summary submission platform is accessible to people with disabilities by offering different codecs and assistive applied sciences.

    Bias Mitigation

    Make use of methods to mitigate bias within the assessment course of, corresponding to blind peer assessment or coaching reviewers on range and inclusion.

    Mentorship and Help

    Supply mentorship applications and help programs for authors from underrepresented teams to boost their summary submission abilities.

    Focused Outreach

    Actively attain out to potential authors from various backgrounds via focused promoting and partnerships with organizations representing these teams.

    Range and Inclusion Committee

    Set up a devoted range and inclusion committee to watch progress, present steering, and handle any challenges associated to selling range and inclusion in summary submissions.

    Range and Inclusion Committee Duties
    – Monitor illustration of underrepresented teams in summary submissions

    – Evaluate and replace language and terminology tips

    – Collaborate with IT to make sure platform accessibility

    – Develop and implement bias mitigation methods

    – Present mentorship and help for authors from various backgrounds

    – Monitor and report on progress towards range and inclusion objectives

    – Tackle any challenges or issues associated to range and inclusion

    Case Research: Examples of Excessive-High quality Abstracts

    1. Introduction

    Abstracts ought to present a concise overview of analysis initiatives and needs to be written in a transparent and concise method. Excessive-quality abstracts are well-written, informative, and interesting. They precisely characterize the analysis challenge and its findings.

    2. Function of Case Research

    Case research can be utilized for example how a selected idea or concept works in observe. They may also be used to check and distinction completely different approaches to an issue.

    ### 3. Standards for Excessive-High quality Case Research

    Excessive-quality case research are:


    • Effectively-written and simple to grasp.

    • Primarily based on strong analysis.

    • Related to the subject of the summary.

    • Thought-provoking and insightful.

    4. Choosing a Case Examine

    When deciding on a case examine, you will need to think about the next components:


    • The relevance of the case examine to the summary.

    • The standard of the analysis that was performed.

    • The provision of information.

    5. Writing a Case Examine Summary

    An summary for a case examine ought to embrace the next data:


    • A short description of the case examine.

    • The analysis strategies that have been used.

    • The findings of the analysis.

    • The implications of the analysis.

    6. Instance of a Excessive-High quality Case Examine Summary

    Standards Excessive-High quality Summary
    Effectively-written and simple to grasp The summary is written in a transparent and concise method. It’s simple to comply with and perceive.
    Primarily based on strong analysis The summary is predicated on strong analysis. The writer cites credible sources and offers proof to help their claims.
    Related to the subject of the summary The summary is related to the subject of the summary. It offers data that’s immediately associated to the subject.
    Thought-provoking and insightful The summary is thought-provoking and insightful. It offers new insights into the subject and raises vital questions.

    Troubleshooting Widespread Challenges: Suggestions and Help

    Technical Difficulties

    For those who encounter technical points whereas submitting your summary, attain out to the AAHPM help crew through e mail or cellphone.

    Content material-Associated Suggestions

    Search enter from colleagues, mentors, or friends to enhance the scientific rigor and readability of your summary’s content material.

    Formatting Points

    Discuss with the summary submission tips and seek the advice of with the AAHPM help crew when you face challenges with formatting.

    Content material Overload

    Be certain that your summary concisely conveys the important thing factors and doesn’t exceed the phrase restrict.

    Summary Submission Deadline

    Concentrate on the summary submission deadline and plan accordingly to keep away from last-minute rushes.

    Plagiarism and Moral Considerations

    Be certain that your summary is authentic work and adheres to moral tips for analysis and publication.

    Suggestions and Help Desk

    Contact Methodology Help
    E-mail aahpm@help.org
    Telephone (800) 555-1212

    Summary Analysis and Determination Course of

    The summary analysis course of is rigorous and entails skilled reviewers assessing your work’s scientific advantage, originality, and relevance to the convention theme.

    Notification of Summary Acceptance

    AHPM will notify you of the summary acceptance or rejection determination through e mail. Reviewers’ suggestions may additionally be offered for accepted abstracts.

    Embracing Innovation in Summary Submission: Instruments and Assets

    Streamlined Submission Course of

    Superior submission portals permit authors to seamlessly navigate via the summary submission course of, guaranteeing a hassle-free expertise.

    Interactive Enhancing and Collaboration

    Collaborate seamlessly with co-authors via real-time enhancing and monitoring instruments inside the submission platform.

    Enhanced Formatting and Preview

    Interactive formatting instruments and preview choices allow authors to visualise their abstracts earlier than submission, guaranteeing adherence to tips.

    Dynamic Subject Matching

    Clever algorithms analyze summary content material and counsel related matters and key phrases for optimum visibility and reviewer task.

    Customizable Submission Kinds

    Tailor summary submission varieties to particular convention necessities, capturing important data whereas streamlining the assessment course of.

    Bulk Submission Choices

    Facilitate environment friendly submission for big groups or establishments by enabling bulk add of a number of abstracts concurrently.

    AI-Powered Textual content Evaluation

    Make the most of AI-powered instruments to research summary content material, offering insights into developments and figuring out frequent themes and areas for enchancment.

    Personalised Submission Monitoring

    Authors can observe the standing of their submissions in real-time, receiving e mail notifications and accessing detailed progress updates.

    On-line Evaluate Administration

    Built-in assessment administration programs allow reviewers to judge abstracts effectively, entry reviewer tips, and supply tailor-made suggestions.

    Complete Reporting and Analytics

    Analyze summary submission information to realize precious insights into convention dynamics, writer participation, and trending analysis areas.

    Device Function
    Submission Portal Interactive submission course of, collaboration instruments
    Formatting Instruments Actual-time preview, customizable templates
    AI Textual content Evaluation Development identification, theme extraction
    On-line Evaluate Administration Environment friendly assessment entry, reviewer tips, suggestions provision
    Reporting and Analytics Submission information evaluation, insights into convention developments

    Aahpm Summary Submission 2025

    The American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Drugs (AAHPM) is now accepting summary submissions for its 2025 Annual Assembly. The assembly can be held in San Diego, California, from October 1-4, 2025.

    The AAHPM Annual Assembly is the biggest gathering of hospice and palliative drugs professionals on this planet. The assembly offers a chance for attendees to study concerning the newest analysis, greatest practices, and coverage points within the area.

    Abstracts are invited on a variety of matters associated to hospice and palliative drugs, together with:

    • Medical care
    • Analysis
    • Schooling
    • Coverage
    • Ethics

    AAHPM encourages submissions from a various vary of views, together with clinicians, researchers, educators, policymakers, and advocates.

    Individuals Additionally Ask About Aahpm Summary Submission 2025

    When is the deadline for summary submissions?

    The deadline for summary submissions is March 1, 2025.

    What are the factors for summary submissions?

    Abstracts needs to be not more than 500 phrases and will embrace:

    • A transparent and concise title
    • An announcement of the issue or speculation
    • An outline of the strategies used
    • A abstract of the outcomes
    • A dialogue of the implications of the findings

    How are abstracts reviewed?

    Abstracts are reviewed by a panel of specialists in hospice and palliative drugs. The reviewers will assess the abstracts based mostly on their originality, significance, and relevance to the sphere.